Skip to content

Excluding targets from stack operations #14899

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
May 14, 2025
Merged

Conversation

i-am-tom
Copy link
Contributor

As well as --target and --target-dependents, we can now use --exclude and --exclude-dependents to remove targets from up/refresh/preview/destroy operations selectively.

@i-am-tom i-am-tom added the area/blog Content issues on blog posts. label Apr 30, 2025
@i-am-tom i-am-tom self-assigned this Apr 30, 2025
@pulumi-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Copy link
Contributor

@lunaris lunaris left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🎉

@pulumi-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@pulumi-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@pulumi-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@pulumi-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@i-am-tom i-am-tom merged commit f738f38 into master May 14, 2025
8 checks passed
@i-am-tom i-am-tom deleted the i-am-tom/exclude-targets branch May 14, 2025 07:41
thoward pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 15, 2025
* Make it so

* TypeScript

* Go

* Linting

* Close the chooser

* .NET

* Tags

* Update content/blog/excluding-targets-from-stack-operations/index.md

Co-authored-by: Will Jones <[email protected]>

* Update index.md

* Update content/blog/excluding-targets-from-stack-operations/index.md

Co-authored-by: Will Jones <[email protected]>

* Edits and messaging

* lint fix

---------

Co-authored-by: Will Jones <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: meagancojocar <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/blog Content issues on blog posts.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants